Dear group,
in the SQL-Server documentation it says:
"Merge replication supports the replication of text, ntext, and image
columns only if they have been updated explicitly by an UPDATE statement
because it causes a trigger to fire that updates meta data ensuring that the
transaction gets propagated to other Subscribers."
Is this also valid for INSERT-Statements?
In our case we have a table where only INSERTS of new rows occur (incl.1
ntext column). Can we replicate this by merge replication without problems?
Do you have a URL to 'prove' this? ;-)
thanks a lot,
regards,
ERic
I understand that you have to have a trigger that fires on insert, to update
the text column in the row again.
I haven't tried this myself.
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Eric Voigt" <eric@.ericvoigt.de> wrote in message
news:2ubq8aF28taboU1@.uni-berlin.de...
> Dear group,
> in the SQL-Server documentation it says:
> "Merge replication supports the replication of text, ntext, and image
> columns only if they have been updated explicitly by an UPDATE statement
> because it causes a trigger to fire that updates meta data ensuring that
the
> transaction gets propagated to other Subscribers."
> Is this also valid for INSERT-Statements?
> In our case we have a table where only INSERTS of new rows occur (incl.1
> ntext column). Can we replicate this by merge replication without
problems?
> Do you have a URL to 'prove' this? ;-)
> thanks a lot,
> regards,
> ERic
>
>
Friday, March 9, 2012
Replication ntext only by UPDATE
Labels:
database,
dear,
documentation,
group,
imagecolumns,
merge,
microsoft,
mysql,
ntext,
oracle,
replication,
server,
sql,
sql-server,
supports,
text,
update
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment